Review content and guidance

How can we improve the methods, standards and guidance that apply to review content?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  1. Update section 4.6.2 - ROB tables do not use yes and no anymore

    The new Cochrane Risk of bias form is no longer ask questions for “yes, unclear, no”, but as “low, unclear and high”, because it is confusing to consider an answer of “yes” to “incomplete outcome data” or “selective reporting” as low risk of bias. The Cochrane handbook has updated for the RoB section (Chapter 8), but not in the chapter 4.6.2 for the introduction of Rob (, so I read several systematic reviews recently, I see people still use “Yes, No, unclear” in their RoB table and quote this chapter.

    I think it would be good to let…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      Planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Handbook  ·  Admin →

    Review content and guidance

    Feedback and Knowledge Base