How can we improve the methods, standards and guidance that apply to review content?

As an author, I'd like to write my protocol Methods in the past tense

It saves rework if the the protocol Introduction and Methods are written as if they are the final review's Introduction and Methods. That idea is re-enforced by using the past tense, and avoids the tedious changes of tense for the review.

2 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • sso
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Paul Glasziou shared this idea  ·   ·  Admin →

    1 comment

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • sso
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • John Hilton commented  · 

        Maybe an alternate solution is to write the majority of methods for both protocols and reviews in a tense-neutral way, using fragments or lists rather than narrative sentences. May have advantages for linked data if could be done consistently with controlled vocab.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base